I like the textures on the first painting, as well as the "aura" around the right hand tree. It feels like it's dancing with another tree in the background. Yes, the middle tree needs to be "fluffier", but more by softening the edges than by filling in all the sky holes. That would make it feel like a lollipop. I can't believe I'm saying this about the panorama paintings, but that newspaper is distracting me! Once I've blocked it out, I like the two at the bottom. They feel immersive somehow—like I'm in a round room and these are painted on the walls surrounding me. I don't know what's with that first one—maybe the even number of manmade objects? maybe their regularity? Not sure, but something. Keep going with the panoramas. That format makes (almost) any subject automatically interesting, I think.
I like the textures on the first painting, as well as the "aura" around the right hand tree. It feels like it's dancing with another tree in the background. Yes, the middle tree needs to be "fluffier", but more by softening the edges than by filling in all the sky holes. That would make it feel like a lollipop. I can't believe I'm saying this about the panorama paintings, but that newspaper is distracting me! Once I've blocked it out, I like the two at the bottom. They feel immersive somehow—like I'm in a round room and these are painted on the walls surrounding me. I don't know what's with that first one—maybe the even number of manmade objects? maybe their regularity? Not sure, but something. Keep going with the panoramas. That format makes (almost) any subject automatically interesting, I think.
ReplyDelete